Planning Train operators

A first class conundrum

At face value, it sounds simple to convert first class coaches into standard class to reduce congestion.

Think of first class and many will think of large seats arranged in pairs on one side of an aisle and singly on the other (so-called 2+1 seating). Trains used by commuters with first class, such as  Southeastern’s Class 375s, have their first class compartments arranged with pairs of seats either side of an aisle (2+2 seating). This is the same as in standard class which means that converting a compartment from first to standard yields few if any extra seats. More could be done be removing tables from standard class and using the space for extra seats.

If there’s little difference in seating capacity, there’s a bigger difference in fare. I’ll stick with my Southeastern theme and take a look at an annual season ticket from Bat & Ball station to London. In standard class, this will cost £3,208.00 (£6.68 per journey); in first class, it’s £4,812.00 (£10.02 per journey). So for Southeastern to convert its coaches it must accept lower fares revenue and, in turn, government will need to pay a higher subsidy to the company.

The problem is slightly different at First Great Western. Here the company has already converted one first class compartment of the diesel Turbo trains to standard class. It is now facing pressure to convert a 2+1 HST coach. But these HSTs are long-distance, inter-city trains that run to South Wales, Bristol and the West Country – all destinations for which classic first-class seating is needed. However, given its small and short fleet of Turbos, FGW is forced to use long-distance stock for commuters.

It’s a mix that doesn’t fit well. The answer for FGW is electrification and provision of 12-car electric multiple units as used into just about every other London terminus. Unfortunately, that answer is still some years away.

By Philip Haigh

Freelance railway writer, former deputy editor at RAIL magazine - news, views and analysis of today's railway.

1 reply on “A first class conundrum”

This is not such a problem, particularly if the volume of standard class passengers increases with higher satisfaction levels. Also we are talking of encouraging more passenger travel at the peak that can get their back-sides on a seat. Sadly FGW, by insisting on converting buffet cars to seating cars have lost a breakfast marketing tool that could have attracted custom. Even these so-called gee-whizz private sector managers have not achieved the happiness of the greatest number of commuters.
It makes me think of the wonderful snack breakfast that I had in a crowded 4-BEP Buffet car circa 1961 from Margate to Victoria! BR did quite a few things right!
But putting in Standard Class seats in place of first class seats is common sense an will enhance revenue stream. Less hot air, more hot bodies with comfortable bottoms on seats.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *